Printed from smellbook.com/smells/sage. This printout keeps the entry for Sage itself: its description, reference card, Connections, questions, evidence, related smells, record details, states, names and citation. It leaves out your own notes, the map, the lists of paths, routes, stories and fragrance directions, and the lists headed “Also linked to” (other entries that share its place or material) and “Linked from”; they are on the page online. The entries this one links to are still printed under Connections and Related smells.
Categories and types group entries for browsing; they are editorial, not evidence. How smells are grouped.
Sage
A dry aromatic herb smell with green, earthy and softly camphoraceous associations.
Its type, Source, means the smell is named after “a physical origin that can contribute a smell”; it is not an evidence source, such as a study or a book. The origin page for Sage (the plant, not this smell entry) lists every smell recorded as coming from it.
Links SmellBook records for this entry: what it comes from, where you meet it, molecules, related smells and comparisons. EDITORIAL links are chosen by SmellBook editors and VERIFIED links come from VERIFIED claims. Nothing here is a ranking, and a molecule is not presented as the cause of the smell.
QUESTIONS ABOUT SAGE
Sage, question by question
What does sage smell like? EDITORIAL
Sage smells dry, green and earthy, with a soft, slightly cooling herbal edge and a faintly dusty texture. Fresh leaves are mellow and velvety, while dried sage turns sharper and more pungent. When cooked in butter or with roasts, the smell becomes warmer and savoury, close to thyme or a mixed herb blend.
It is met in herb gardens, kitchens and spice jars, in bunches of dried herbs, and in dishes where the leaves are cooked in butter or oil, roasted with meat or vegetables, or added to stuffings, sauces and pasta. Many cooks know it from slow, warming meals in cooler weather.
Typical settings: herb garden, kitchen, dried herbs.
6 molecules are named in these claims; see the evidence for the role each claim gives them. Each molecule these claims name has only the role its claim states; one molecule is not the whole smell.
How do people describe it, and what is it compared with? EDITORIAL
Sage is presented as a sensory herb profile, not as a medicinal or ritual-health claim.
Answers marked EDITORIAL are written by SmellBook editors to describe the experience and add no scientific fact. Answers marked VERIFIED point to claims on published sources, checked against each source's own summary where one was available (each claim's page says how); what each claim supports is in its own text and scope.
01WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYSVERIFIED
What the evidence supports
These 2 VERIFIED scientific claims, from 2 sources, cover the chemistry reported and the conditions or places studied. How the scientific evidence was produced: odour analysis with human assessors and chemical composition. Each claim says only what its source supports, in the scope shown with it.
What is editorial
The description, smell words, associations and related smells on this page are written by SmellBook's editors and labelled EDITORIAL or CULTURAL; a claim below does not make them VERIFIED.
Essential oil of wild and cultivated sage was dominated by cis-thujone, camphor and 1,8-cineole, in proportions that differed between wild and cultivated plants.
Salvia officinalis oils from one study; composition, not odour potency, and growing conditions such as shading shift the proportions.
Also covers: chemistry reported (the claim names compounds or kinds of compounds).
How this was found: Chemical composition. Compounds were identified or measured, without any assessment of their odour. Source: primary study; chemistry work.
In fresh leaves of garden sage, aroma extract dilution analysis characterised 39 aroma-active compounds, with (Z)-3-hexenal,1,8-cineol, borneol and eugenol at the highest flavour dilution factors, and a mixture of 22 key compounds mimicked the overall aroma; on drying at 50 °C, (Z)-3-hexenal, phenylacetaldehyde and 3-(methylthio)propanal were almost totally lost while monoterpenes stayed nearly unchanged, and the laboratory-dried leaves were rated as having the most typical sage aroma, unlike six commercial samples.
Leaves of one Italian garden sage grown in a German greenhouse and dried in the laboratory; commercial dried sage differed again.
Also covers: chemistry reported (the claim names compounds or kinds of compounds).
How this was found: Odour analysis with human assessors. People smelled the separated compounds or the material itself (for example gas chromatography–olfactometry, dilution analysis, recombination or a sensory panel). Source: primary study; sensory or perception work. Studied: fresh and laboratory-dried leaves of one garden sage, by dilution analysis and a recombined aroma.
Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Fresh Leaves of Garden Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) by Means of the Sensomics Approach: Influence of Drying and Storage and Comparison with Commercial Dried Sage
Each molecule is named by the claim shown after it. Each molecule named here has only the role its claim states; one molecule is not the whole smell. About molecules in SmellBook
Each step is a relationship SmellBook editors recorded in the knowledge graph, named as it is published there. Paths are not ranked or personalised, and they do not mean the smells smell alike.
Each step is a molecule that a VERIFIED claim names for both smells, in whatever role the claims state. Sharing a molecule does not mean two smells smell alike.
Directions name SmellBook entries as descriptions to refer to; they are not product recommendations. Fragrance-free is always a valid choice for a space.
CULTURAL: This entry's associations depend on context, language, memory or culture; its description and smell words are editorial. It says nothing about research or historical evidence; evidence for this entry is shown separately: VERIFIED.
A state says how an entry is met, such as wet, aged or roasted. It does not create a new smell, and it adds no scientific fact by itself: states marked EDITORIAL come from the entry's own records, and only those marked VERIFIED are reported by a VERIFIED claim.
Names and identity for Sage
How this entry is identified and named, for citing it or matching it with other records.
@misc{smellbook_sage_r4,
author = {{SmellBook}},
title = {Sage},
year = {2026},
note = {SmellBook Public Atlas, revision 4, 2026-10-14, smellbook:smell:sage},
url = {https://smellbook.com/smells/sage}
}
TY - ENCYC
ID - smellbook-sage-r4
TI - Sage
AU - SmellBook
T2 - SmellBook Public Atlas
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
ET - revision 4
UR - https://smellbook.com/smells/sage
N1 - SB-0130; smellbook:smell:sage; resolver https://smellbook.com/id/smell/sage
ER -
The citation names revision 4 of 2026-10-14, so a reader can tell exactly which version was cited. Citing records what was read; it does not grant a licence.
PROFILE NOTE
Sage is presented as a sensory herb profile, not as a medicinal or ritual-health claim.