{"schemaVersion":"1.0","generatedAt":"2026-09-22","status":"EXPERIMENTAL","mode":"read-only-context","purpose":"Claim/source context, evidence-gap markers and deterministic provenance trails for public Labs review packets.","prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","label":"Read claim scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","label":"Inspect source origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","label":"Test pair relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","label":"Interpret gaps carefully","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","label":"Keep verification separate","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"summary":{"reviewPackets":80,"packetsWithAnyVerifiedClaimContext":25,"packetsWithNoVerifiedClaimContext":55,"packetsWithPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":0,"registeredClaimsReferenced":8,"registeredSourcesReferenced":8},"packetRecords":80,"boundaries":{"contextOnly":"VERIFIED claims are shown as claim-specific context. A claim attached to either smell does not verify the candidate relation.","pairClaim":"Even when one VERIFIED claim mentions both smell slugs, the relation candidate is not automatically VERIFIED; claim text and scope must be evaluated separately.","gaps":"Missing VERIFIED claim context is an evidence-coverage gap only, not negative evidence, rejection, falsification or a low-confidence signal.","noScoring":"Claim count, source count, source tier and publication date are descriptive metadata and are not review scores, confidence, probability or recommendation strength.","readOnly":"Context Lab is read-only and records no reviewer decision, annotation, approval or rejection.","promotion":"Context inspection has zero promotion effect on PREDICTED, REVIEWED_EDITORIAL, canonical relations or VERIFIED evidence.","personalization":"Review Context does not use browser-local Personal SmellBook state."},"packets":[{"id":"CONTEXT-mango--strawberry","slug":"mango--strawberry","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-mango--strawberry","candidateId":"PRED-mango--strawberry","pair":{"a":{"slug":"strawberry","id":"SB-0053","name":"Strawberry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","fresh","green"],"contexts":["fresh berries","dessert","market"]},"b":{"slug":"mango","id":"SB-0152","name":"Mango","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","floral"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","smoothie"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-MANGO-001","slug":"mango-multi-compound-aroma","title":"Mango aroma is multi-compound and cultivar-dependent","smellSlugs":["mango"],"sourceIds":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"text":"Mango aroma arises from multiple odor-active volatile compounds rather than one single defining molecule, and the relative contribution of those compounds varies across cultivars.","scope":"Supports a multi-compound, cultivar-dependent aroma model; it does not define one universal mango volatile profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-MANGO-2006","slug":"mango-aroma-2006","title":"Contribution of volatile compounds to mango (Mangifera indica L.) aroma","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","date":"2006-01-20","doi":"10.1002/ffj.1703","url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1703"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-MANGO-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-MANGO-2006","slug":"mango-aroma-2006","title":"Contribution of volatile compounds to mango (Mangifera indica L.) aroma","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","date":"2006-01-20","doi":"10.1002/ffj.1703","url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1703"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-mango--strawberry","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-mango--strawberry","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-MANGO-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/mango--strawberry","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--caramel","slug":"baked-apple--caramel","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--caramel","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--caramel","pair":{"a":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--caramel","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--caramel","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--caramel","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-banana--brown-sugar","slug":"banana--brown-sugar","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-banana--brown-sugar","candidateId":"PRED-banana--brown-sugar","pair":{"a":{"slug":"banana","id":"SB-0052","name":"Banana","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["ripe fruit","breakfast","smoothie"]},"b":{"slug":"brown-sugar","id":"SB-0181","name":"Brown Sugar","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","molasses"],"contexts":["baking cupboard","breakfast","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-banana--brown-sugar","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-banana--brown-sugar","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/banana--brown-sugar","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-basil--cut-grass","slug":"basil--cut-grass","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-basil--cut-grass","candidateId":"PRED-basil--cut-grass","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cut-grass","id":"SB-0015","name":"Cut Grass","category":"Nature","type":"State / Experience","descriptors":["green","fresh","leafy","moist"],"contexts":["fresh lawn","park","garden"]},"b":{"slug":"basil","id":"SB-0033","name":"Basil","category":"Nature","type":"Source","descriptors":["green","herbal","aromatic","fresh"],"contexts":["kitchen herb","garden","freshly torn leaf"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-GREEN-001","slug":"green-leaf-volatiles-after-plant-damage","title":"Green leaf volatiles after plant damage","smellSlugs":["cut-grass","tomato-leaf"],"sourceIds":["SRC-GLV-2022"],"text":"Green leaf volatiles are rapidly produced when plant tissue is damaged, helping explain the vivid green odour associated with freshly cut or crushed plant material.","scope":"Supports the general mechanism of wound-induced green leaf volatiles; exact profiles vary across plant species and conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-GLV-2022","slug":"green-leaf-volatiles-2022","title":"Green Leaf Volatiles—The Forefront of Plant Responses Against Biotic Attack","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Plant and Cell Physiology","date":"2022-10-31","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcac117","url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcac117"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-GREEN-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-GLV-2022"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-GLV-2022","slug":"green-leaf-volatiles-2022","title":"Green Leaf Volatiles—The Forefront of Plant Responses Against Biotic Attack","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Plant and Cell Physiology","date":"2022-10-31","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcac117","url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcac117"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-basil--cut-grass","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-basil--cut-grass","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-GREEN-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-GLV-2022"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/basil--cut-grass","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-black-pepper--toasted-almonds","slug":"black-pepper--toasted-almonds","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-black-pepper--toasted-almonds","candidateId":"PRED-black-pepper--toasted-almonds","pair":{"a":{"slug":"black-pepper","id":"SB-0158","name":"Black Pepper","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","pungent","dry","warm"],"contexts":["kitchen","pepper mill","cooked food"]},"b":{"slug":"toasted-almonds","id":"SB-0180","name":"Toasted Almonds","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["nutty","toasted","warm","dry"],"contexts":["baking","snack","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-PEPPER-001","slug":"black-pepper-volatile-complexity","title":"Black pepper has a complex volatile profile","smellSlugs":["black-pepper"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"text":"Black pepper fruits contain a complex volatile profile associated with their essential oil, with numerous compounds contributing to the characteristic aroma.","scope":"Supports chemical complexity of black-pepper volatiles; origin and processing can change the profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PEPPER-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-black-pepper--toasted-almonds","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-black-pepper--toasted-almonds","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PEPPER-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/black-pepper--toasted-almonds","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-bus-interior--taxi-interior","slug":"bus-interior--taxi-interior","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-bus-interior--taxi-interior","candidateId":"PRED-bus-interior--taxi-interior","pair":{"a":{"slug":"taxi-interior","id":"SB-0119","name":"Taxi Interior","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["fabric","urban","ambient","manufactured"],"contexts":["taxi ride","rideshare","urban transport"]},"b":{"slug":"bus-interior","id":"SB-0169","name":"Bus Interior","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["transit","fabric","rubbery","ambient"],"contexts":["city bus","commute","public transport"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-bus-interior--taxi-interior","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-bus-interior--taxi-interior","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/bus-interior--taxi-interior","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--cinnamon","slug":"caramel--cinnamon","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--cinnamon","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--cinnamon","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon","id":"SB-0035","name":"Cinnamon","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--cinnamon","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--cinnamon","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--cinnamon","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--clove","slug":"caramel--clove","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--clove","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--clove","pair":{"a":{"slug":"clove","id":"SB-0156","name":"Clove","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--clove","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--clove","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--clove","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--honey","slug":"caramel--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--honey","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--vanilla-bean","slug":"caramel--vanilla-bean","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--vanilla-bean","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--vanilla-bean","pair":{"a":{"slug":"vanilla-bean","id":"SB-0020","name":"Vanilla Bean","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["vanilla pod","baking","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--vanilla-bean","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--vanilla-bean","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--vanilla-bean","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cherry--mango","slug":"cherry--mango","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cherry--mango","candidateId":"PRED-cherry--mango","pair":{"a":{"slug":"mango","id":"SB-0152","name":"Mango","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","floral"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","smoothie"]},"b":{"slug":"cherry","id":"SB-0154","name":"Cherry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","tart","bright"],"contexts":["fresh cherries","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-MANGO-001","slug":"mango-multi-compound-aroma","title":"Mango aroma is multi-compound and cultivar-dependent","smellSlugs":["mango"],"sourceIds":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"text":"Mango aroma arises from multiple odor-active volatile compounds rather than one single defining molecule, and the relative contribution of those compounds varies across cultivars.","scope":"Supports a multi-compound, cultivar-dependent aroma model; it does not define one universal mango volatile profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-MANGO-2006","slug":"mango-aroma-2006","title":"Contribution of volatile compounds to mango (Mangifera indica L.) aroma","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","date":"2006-01-20","doi":"10.1002/ffj.1703","url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1703"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-MANGO-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-MANGO-2006","slug":"mango-aroma-2006","title":"Contribution of volatile compounds to mango (Mangifera indica L.) aroma","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","date":"2006-01-20","doi":"10.1002/ffj.1703","url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1703"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cherry--mango","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cherry--mango","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-MANGO-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-MANGO-2006"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cherry--mango","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cherry--peach","slug":"cherry--peach","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cherry--peach","candidateId":"PRED-cherry--peach","pair":{"a":{"slug":"peach","id":"SB-0125","name":"Peach","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","soft","floral"],"contexts":["ripe fruit","market","dessert"]},"b":{"slug":"cherry","id":"SB-0154","name":"Cherry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","tart","bright"],"contexts":["fresh cherries","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cherry--peach","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cherry--peach","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cherry--peach","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cherry--pear","slug":"cherry--pear","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cherry--pear","candidateId":"PRED-cherry--pear","pair":{"a":{"slug":"pear","id":"SB-0126","name":"Pear","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","fresh","sweet","green"],"contexts":["fruit bowl","market","freshly cut pear"]},"b":{"slug":"cherry","id":"SB-0154","name":"Cherry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","tart","bright"],"contexts":["fresh cherries","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cherry--pear","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cherry--pear","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cherry--pear","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cherry--pineapple","slug":"cherry--pineapple","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cherry--pineapple","candidateId":"PRED-cherry--pineapple","pair":{"a":{"slug":"pineapple","id":"SB-0151","name":"Pineapple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","tart"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","dessert"]},"b":{"slug":"cherry","id":"SB-0154","name":"Cherry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","tart","bright"],"contexts":["fresh cherries","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-PINEAPPLE-001","slug":"pineapple-aroma-key-volatiles","title":"Pineapple aroma and key volatile contributors","smellSlugs":["pineapple"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"text":"Pineapple aroma has been linked to a large set of volatile organic compounds, with a smaller subset identified as key contributors to its characteristic sensory aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and key volatile contributors; exact profiles differ by variety and maturity.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cherry--pineapple","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cherry--pineapple","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cherry--pineapple","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon--honey","slug":"cinnamon--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon--honey","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon","id":"SB-0035","name":"Cinnamon","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon--maple-syrup","slug":"cinnamon--maple-syrup","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon--maple-syrup","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon--maple-syrup","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon","id":"SB-0035","name":"Cinnamon","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"maple-syrup","id":"SB-0136","name":"Maple Syrup","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["sweet","warm","caramelized","woody"],"contexts":["breakfast","pancakes","baking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon--maple-syrup","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon--maple-syrup","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon--maple-syrup","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","slug":"cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon-roll--fresh-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon-roll--honey","slug":"cinnamon-roll--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--honey","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]},"b":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon-roll--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clove--honey","slug":"clove--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clove--honey","candidateId":"PRED-clove--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"clove","id":"SB-0156","name":"Clove","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clove--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clove--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clove--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cooked-rice--fresh-bread","slug":"cooked-rice--fresh-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cooked-rice--fresh-bread","candidateId":"PRED-cooked-rice--fresh-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"cooked-rice","id":"SB-0159","name":"Cooked Rice","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["grain","warm","soft","starchy"],"contexts":["kitchen","rice cooker","family meal"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-RICE-001","slug":"cooked-rice-aroma-and-2ap","title":"Cooked rice aroma and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline","smellSlugs":["cooked-rice"],"sourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"text":"Cooked rice contains many volatile compounds, while 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline is a well-established contributor to the characteristic aroma of aromatic rice.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and the role of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in aromatic rice; not every rice variety has the same sensory profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-RICE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cooked-rice--fresh-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cooked-rice--fresh-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-RICE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cooked-rice--fresh-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cooked-rice--popcorn","slug":"cooked-rice--popcorn","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cooked-rice--popcorn","candidateId":"PRED-cooked-rice--popcorn","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cooked-rice","id":"SB-0159","name":"Cooked Rice","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["grain","warm","soft","starchy"],"contexts":["kitchen","rice cooker","family meal"]},"b":{"slug":"popcorn","id":"SB-0160","name":"Popcorn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","grain","buttery"],"contexts":["kitchen","movie night","snack bowl"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-RICE-001","slug":"cooked-rice-aroma-and-2ap","title":"Cooked rice aroma and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline","smellSlugs":["cooked-rice"],"sourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"text":"Cooked rice contains many volatile compounds, while 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline is a well-established contributor to the characteristic aroma of aromatic rice.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and the role of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in aromatic rice; not every rice variety has the same sensory profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-RICE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cooked-rice--popcorn","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cooked-rice--popcorn","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-RICE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cooked-rice--popcorn","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-fresh-bread--popcorn","slug":"fresh-bread--popcorn","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-fresh-bread--popcorn","candidateId":"PRED-fresh-bread--popcorn","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"popcorn","id":"SB-0160","name":"Popcorn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","grain","buttery"],"contexts":["kitchen","movie night","snack bowl"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-fresh-bread--popcorn","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-fresh-bread--popcorn","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/fresh-bread--popcorn","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","slug":"fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","candidateId":"PRED-fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"toasted-almonds","id":"SB-0180","name":"Toasted Almonds","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["nutty","toasted","warm","dry"],"contexts":["baking","snack","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/fresh-bread--toasted-almonds","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-fresh-corn--strawberry","slug":"fresh-corn--strawberry","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-fresh-corn--strawberry","candidateId":"PRED-fresh-corn--strawberry","pair":{"a":{"slug":"strawberry","id":"SB-0053","name":"Strawberry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","fresh","green"],"contexts":["fresh berries","dessert","market"]},"b":{"slug":"fresh-corn","id":"SB-0132","name":"Fresh Corn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["sweet","green","grain","fresh"],"contexts":["corn cob","market","summer kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-fresh-corn--strawberry","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-fresh-corn--strawberry","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/fresh-corn--strawberry","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-grape--watermelon","slug":"grape--watermelon","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-grape--watermelon","candidateId":"PRED-grape--watermelon","pair":{"a":{"slug":"watermelon","id":"SB-0128","name":"Watermelon","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","watery","fresh","green"],"contexts":["summer table","picnic","fresh fruit"]},"b":{"slug":"grape","id":"SB-0153","name":"Grape","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","fresh","sweet","juicy"],"contexts":["fruit bowl","market","picnic"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-grape--watermelon","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-grape--watermelon","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/grape--watermelon","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-maple-syrup--nutmeg","slug":"maple-syrup--nutmeg","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-maple-syrup--nutmeg","candidateId":"PRED-maple-syrup--nutmeg","pair":{"a":{"slug":"maple-syrup","id":"SB-0136","name":"Maple Syrup","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["sweet","warm","caramelized","woody"],"contexts":["breakfast","pancakes","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"nutmeg","id":"SB-0157","name":"Nutmeg","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","dry","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-maple-syrup--nutmeg","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-maple-syrup--nutmeg","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/maple-syrup--nutmeg","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","slug":"maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","candidateId":"PRED-maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","pair":{"a":{"slug":"vanilla-bean","id":"SB-0020","name":"Vanilla Bean","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["vanilla pod","baking","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"maple-syrup","id":"SB-0136","name":"Maple Syrup","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["sweet","warm","caramelized","woody"],"contexts":["breakfast","pancakes","baking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/maple-syrup--vanilla-bean","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-nutmeg--toasted-almonds","slug":"nutmeg--toasted-almonds","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-nutmeg--toasted-almonds","candidateId":"PRED-nutmeg--toasted-almonds","pair":{"a":{"slug":"nutmeg","id":"SB-0157","name":"Nutmeg","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","dry","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","dessert"]},"b":{"slug":"toasted-almonds","id":"SB-0180","name":"Toasted Almonds","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["nutty","toasted","warm","dry"],"contexts":["baking","snack","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-nutmeg--toasted-almonds","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-nutmeg--toasted-almonds","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/nutmeg--toasted-almonds","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-peach--pineapple","slug":"peach--pineapple","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-peach--pineapple","candidateId":"PRED-peach--pineapple","pair":{"a":{"slug":"peach","id":"SB-0125","name":"Peach","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","soft","floral"],"contexts":["ripe fruit","market","dessert"]},"b":{"slug":"pineapple","id":"SB-0151","name":"Pineapple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","tart"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-PINEAPPLE-001","slug":"pineapple-aroma-key-volatiles","title":"Pineapple aroma and key volatile contributors","smellSlugs":["pineapple"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"text":"Pineapple aroma has been linked to a large set of volatile organic compounds, with a smaller subset identified as key contributors to its characteristic sensory aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and key volatile contributors; exact profiles differ by variety and maturity.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-peach--pineapple","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-peach--pineapple","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/peach--pineapple","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-pear--strawberry","slug":"pear--strawberry","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-pear--strawberry","candidateId":"PRED-pear--strawberry","pair":{"a":{"slug":"strawberry","id":"SB-0053","name":"Strawberry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","fresh","green"],"contexts":["fresh berries","dessert","market"]},"b":{"slug":"pear","id":"SB-0126","name":"Pear","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","fresh","sweet","green"],"contexts":["fruit bowl","market","freshly cut pear"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-pear--strawberry","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-pear--strawberry","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/pear--strawberry","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-pineapple--strawberry","slug":"pineapple--strawberry","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-pineapple--strawberry","candidateId":"PRED-pineapple--strawberry","pair":{"a":{"slug":"strawberry","id":"SB-0053","name":"Strawberry","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","fresh","green"],"contexts":["fresh berries","dessert","market"]},"b":{"slug":"pineapple","id":"SB-0151","name":"Pineapple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","tart"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-PINEAPPLE-001","slug":"pineapple-aroma-key-volatiles","title":"Pineapple aroma and key volatile contributors","smellSlugs":["pineapple"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"text":"Pineapple aroma has been linked to a large set of volatile organic compounds, with a smaller subset identified as key contributors to its characteristic sensory aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and key volatile contributors; exact profiles differ by variety and maturity.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-pineapple--strawberry","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-pineapple--strawberry","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/pineapple--strawberry","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-popcorn--toast","slug":"popcorn--toast","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-popcorn--toast","candidateId":"PRED-popcorn--toast","pair":{"a":{"slug":"toast","id":"SB-0037","name":"Toast","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","roasted"],"contexts":["breakfast","kitchen","toast rack"]},"b":{"slug":"popcorn","id":"SB-0160","name":"Popcorn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","grain","buttery"],"contexts":["kitchen","movie night","snack bowl"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-popcorn--toast","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-popcorn--toast","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/popcorn--toast","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-popcorn--toasted-almonds","slug":"popcorn--toasted-almonds","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-popcorn--toasted-almonds","candidateId":"PRED-popcorn--toasted-almonds","pair":{"a":{"slug":"popcorn","id":"SB-0160","name":"Popcorn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","grain","buttery"],"contexts":["kitchen","movie night","snack bowl"]},"b":{"slug":"toasted-almonds","id":"SB-0180","name":"Toasted Almonds","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["nutty","toasted","warm","dry"],"contexts":["baking","snack","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-popcorn--toasted-almonds","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-popcorn--toasted-almonds","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/popcorn--toasted-almonds","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-toast--toasted-almonds","slug":"toast--toasted-almonds","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-toast--toasted-almonds","candidateId":"PRED-toast--toasted-almonds","pair":{"a":{"slug":"toast","id":"SB-0037","name":"Toast","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","roasted"],"contexts":["breakfast","kitchen","toast rack"]},"b":{"slug":"toasted-almonds","id":"SB-0180","name":"Toasted Almonds","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["nutty","toasted","warm","dry"],"contexts":["baking","snack","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-toast--toasted-almonds","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-toast--toasted-almonds","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/toast--toasted-almonds","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","slug":"airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","candidateId":"PRED-airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","pair":{"a":{"slug":"hospital-corridor","id":"SB-0116","name":"Hospital Corridor","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["clean","clinical","cool","ambient"],"contexts":["hospital corridor","waiting area","clinical building"]},"b":{"slug":"airplane-cabin","id":"SB-0118","name":"Airplane Cabin","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["dry","clean","transit","ambient"],"contexts":["aircraft cabin","boarding","long flight"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/airplane-cabin--hospital-corridor","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-almond--banana","slug":"almond--banana","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-almond--banana","candidateId":"PRED-almond--banana","pair":{"a":{"slug":"banana","id":"SB-0052","name":"Banana","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","sweet","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["ripe fruit","breakfast","smoothie"]},"b":{"slug":"almond","id":"SB-0124","name":"Almond","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["nutty","dry","soft","sweet"],"contexts":["nuts","baking","market"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-almond--banana","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-almond--banana","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/almond--banana","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-almond--brown-sugar","slug":"almond--brown-sugar","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-almond--brown-sugar","candidateId":"PRED-almond--brown-sugar","pair":{"a":{"slug":"almond","id":"SB-0124","name":"Almond","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["nutty","dry","soft","sweet"],"contexts":["nuts","baking","market"]},"b":{"slug":"brown-sugar","id":"SB-0181","name":"Brown Sugar","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","molasses"],"contexts":["baking cupboard","breakfast","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-almond--brown-sugar","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-almond--brown-sugar","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/almond--brown-sugar","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-apple--pineapple","slug":"apple--pineapple","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-apple--pineapple","candidateId":"PRED-apple--pineapple","pair":{"a":{"slug":"apple","id":"SB-0051","name":"Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","fresh","green","sweet"],"contexts":["fruit bowl","freshly cut apple","orchard"]},"b":{"slug":"pineapple","id":"SB-0151","name":"Pineapple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["fruity","tropical","sweet","tart"],"contexts":["fresh fruit","market","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-PINEAPPLE-001","slug":"pineapple-aroma-key-volatiles","title":"Pineapple aroma and key volatile contributors","smellSlugs":["pineapple"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"text":"Pineapple aroma has been linked to a large set of volatile organic compounds, with a smaller subset identified as key contributors to its characteristic sensory aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and key volatile contributors; exact profiles differ by variety and maturity.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023","slug":"pineapple-aroma-2023","title":"Review of the Aroma Chemistry of Pineapple (Ananas comosus)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","date":"2023-02-24","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08546"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-apple--pineapple","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-apple--pineapple","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PINEAPPLE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PINEAPPLE-2023"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/apple--pineapple","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","slug":"asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","candidateId":"PRED-asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","pair":{"a":{"slug":"asphalt-after-rain","id":"SB-0023","name":"Asphalt After Rain","category":"Places","type":"State / Place Experience","descriptors":["wet","mineral","dark","urban"],"contexts":["city street after rain","car park","summer shower"]},"b":{"slug":"rain-on-concrete","id":"SB-0106","name":"Rain on Concrete","category":"Places","type":"State / Place Experience","descriptors":["wet","mineral","cool","urban"],"contexts":["city courtyard","sidewalk","concrete balcony"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/asphalt-after-rain--rain-on-concrete","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","slug":"asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","candidateId":"PRED-asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","pair":{"a":{"slug":"asphalt-after-rain","id":"SB-0023","name":"Asphalt After Rain","category":"Places","type":"State / Place Experience","descriptors":["wet","mineral","dark","urban"],"contexts":["city street after rain","car park","summer shower"]},"b":{"slug":"rainy-bus-stop","id":"SB-0148","name":"Rainy Bus Stop","category":"Places","type":"Place / State","descriptors":["wet","urban","metallic","cool"],"contexts":["bus shelter","rainy commute","wet roadside"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/asphalt-after-rain--rainy-bus-stop","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-autumn-leaves--clay","slug":"autumn-leaves--clay","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-autumn-leaves--clay","candidateId":"PRED-autumn-leaves--clay","pair":{"a":{"slug":"clay","id":"SB-0104","name":"Clay","category":"Nature","type":"Material / Earth","descriptors":["earthy","mineral","damp","cool"],"contexts":["pottery studio","wet clay","earth"]},"b":{"slug":"autumn-leaves","id":"SB-0107","name":"Autumn Leaves","category":"Nature","type":"Seasonal / Environment","descriptors":["leafy","earthy","dry","damp"],"contexts":["park","forest path","garden"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-autumn-leaves--clay","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-autumn-leaves--clay","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/autumn-leaves--clay","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-autumn-leaves--moss","slug":"autumn-leaves--moss","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-autumn-leaves--moss","candidateId":"PRED-autumn-leaves--moss","pair":{"a":{"slug":"moss","id":"SB-0061","name":"Moss","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Environment","descriptors":["green","damp","earthy","cool"],"contexts":["shaded forest","wet stone","tree bark"]},"b":{"slug":"autumn-leaves","id":"SB-0107","name":"Autumn Leaves","category":"Nature","type":"Seasonal / Environment","descriptors":["leafy","earthy","dry","damp"],"contexts":["park","forest path","garden"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-autumn-leaves--moss","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-autumn-leaves--moss","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/autumn-leaves--moss","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","slug":"baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--cinnamon-roll","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--fresh-bread","slug":"baked-apple--fresh-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--fresh-bread","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--fresh-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--fresh-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--fresh-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--fresh-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--fried-onions","slug":"baked-apple--fried-onions","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--fried-onions","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--fried-onions","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fried-onions","id":"SB-0134","name":"Fried Onions","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["savory","warm","sweet","fried"],"contexts":["frying pan","restaurant kitchen","home cooking"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--fried-onions","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--fried-onions","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--fried-onions","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--honey","slug":"baked-apple--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--honey","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--maple-syrup","slug":"baked-apple--maple-syrup","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--maple-syrup","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--maple-syrup","pair":{"a":{"slug":"maple-syrup","id":"SB-0136","name":"Maple Syrup","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["sweet","warm","caramelized","woody"],"contexts":["breakfast","pancakes","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--maple-syrup","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--maple-syrup","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--maple-syrup","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-baked-apple--vanilla-bean","slug":"baked-apple--vanilla-bean","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-baked-apple--vanilla-bean","candidateId":"PRED-baked-apple--vanilla-bean","pair":{"a":{"slug":"vanilla-bean","id":"SB-0020","name":"Vanilla Bean","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["vanilla pod","baking","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"baked-apple","id":"SB-0179","name":"Baked Apple","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["fruity","warm","sweet","baked"],"contexts":["oven","dessert","home kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-baked-apple--vanilla-bean","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-baked-apple--vanilla-bean","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/baked-apple--vanilla-bean","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-basil--rosemary","slug":"basil--rosemary","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-basil--rosemary","candidateId":"PRED-basil--rosemary","pair":{"a":{"slug":"basil","id":"SB-0033","name":"Basil","category":"Nature","type":"Source","descriptors":["green","herbal","aromatic","fresh"],"contexts":["kitchen herb","garden","freshly torn leaf"]},"b":{"slug":"rosemary","id":"SB-0129","name":"Rosemary","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Herb","descriptors":["herbal","resinous","green","dry"],"contexts":["herb garden","kitchen","roasted food"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-basil--rosemary","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-basil--rosemary","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/basil--rosemary","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-black-pepper--grilled-bread","slug":"black-pepper--grilled-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-black-pepper--grilled-bread","candidateId":"PRED-black-pepper--grilled-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"grilled-bread","id":"SB-0135","name":"Grilled Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","browned"],"contexts":["grill","breakfast","restaurant"]},"b":{"slug":"black-pepper","id":"SB-0158","name":"Black Pepper","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","pungent","dry","warm"],"contexts":["kitchen","pepper mill","cooked food"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-PEPPER-001","slug":"black-pepper-volatile-complexity","title":"Black pepper has a complex volatile profile","smellSlugs":["black-pepper"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"text":"Black pepper fruits contain a complex volatile profile associated with their essential oil, with numerous compounds contributing to the characteristic aroma.","scope":"Supports chemical complexity of black-pepper volatiles; origin and processing can change the profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PEPPER-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-black-pepper--grilled-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-black-pepper--grilled-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PEPPER-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/black-pepper--grilled-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-black-pepper--toast","slug":"black-pepper--toast","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-black-pepper--toast","candidateId":"PRED-black-pepper--toast","pair":{"a":{"slug":"toast","id":"SB-0037","name":"Toast","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","roasted"],"contexts":["breakfast","kitchen","toast rack"]},"b":{"slug":"black-pepper","id":"SB-0158","name":"Black Pepper","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","pungent","dry","warm"],"contexts":["kitchen","pepper mill","cooked food"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-PEPPER-001","slug":"black-pepper-volatile-complexity","title":"Black pepper has a complex volatile profile","smellSlugs":["black-pepper"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"text":"Black pepper fruits contain a complex volatile profile associated with their essential oil, with numerous compounds contributing to the characteristic aroma.","scope":"Supports chemical complexity of black-pepper volatiles; origin and processing can change the profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PEPPER-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PEPPER-2019","slug":"black-pepper-volatiles-2019","title":"Volatiles of Black Pepper Fruits (Piper nigrum L.)","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Molecules","date":"2019-11-21","doi":"10.3390/molecules24234244","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234244"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-black-pepper--toast","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-black-pepper--toast","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PEPPER-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PEPPER-2019"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/black-pepper--toast","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-black-tea--grilled-bread","slug":"black-tea--grilled-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-black-tea--grilled-bread","candidateId":"PRED-black-tea--grilled-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"black-tea","id":"SB-0058","name":"Black Tea","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["dry","warm","aromatic","tannic"],"contexts":["tea cup","breakfast","afternoon break"]},"b":{"slug":"grilled-bread","id":"SB-0135","name":"Grilled Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","browned"],"contexts":["grill","breakfast","restaurant"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-black-tea--grilled-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-black-tea--grilled-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/black-tea--grilled-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-black-tea--toast","slug":"black-tea--toast","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-black-tea--toast","candidateId":"PRED-black-tea--toast","pair":{"a":{"slug":"toast","id":"SB-0037","name":"Toast","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","roasted"],"contexts":["breakfast","kitchen","toast rack"]},"b":{"slug":"black-tea","id":"SB-0058","name":"Black Tea","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["dry","warm","aromatic","tannic"],"contexts":["tea cup","breakfast","afternoon break"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-black-tea--toast","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-black-tea--toast","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/black-tea--toast","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-bookstore--office","slug":"bookstore--office","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-bookstore--office","candidateId":"PRED-bookstore--office","pair":{"a":{"slug":"bookstore","id":"SB-0071","name":"Bookstore","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","dry","quiet","woody"],"contexts":["independent bookstore","bookshop aisle","new books"]},"b":{"slug":"office","id":"SB-0143","name":"Office","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","dry","ambient","work"],"contexts":["desk area","meeting room","shared office"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-bookstore--office","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-bookstore--office","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/bookstore--office","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-bookstore--woodshop","slug":"bookstore--woodshop","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-bookstore--woodshop","candidateId":"PRED-bookstore--woodshop","pair":{"a":{"slug":"bookstore","id":"SB-0071","name":"Bookstore","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","dry","quiet","woody"],"contexts":["independent bookstore","bookshop aisle","new books"]},"b":{"slug":"woodshop","id":"SB-0163","name":"Woodshop","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["woody","dry","fresh","workshop"],"contexts":["carpentry shop","woodworking bench","sawdust floor"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-bookstore--woodshop","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-bookstore--woodshop","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/bookstore--woodshop","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","slug":"brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","candidateId":"PRED-brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]},"b":{"slug":"brown-sugar","id":"SB-0181","name":"Brown Sugar","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","molasses"],"contexts":["baking cupboard","breakfast","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/brown-sugar--cinnamon-roll","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-brown-sugar--coconut","slug":"brown-sugar--coconut","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--coconut","candidateId":"PRED-brown-sugar--coconut","pair":{"a":{"slug":"coconut","id":"SB-0060","name":"Coconut","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Food","descriptors":["creamy","sweet","tropical","soft"],"contexts":["coconut flesh","dessert","cosmetic association"]},"b":{"slug":"brown-sugar","id":"SB-0181","name":"Brown Sugar","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","molasses"],"contexts":["baking cupboard","breakfast","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-brown-sugar--coconut","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--coconut","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/brown-sugar--coconut","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-brown-sugar--honey","slug":"brown-sugar--honey","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--honey","candidateId":"PRED-brown-sugar--honey","pair":{"a":{"slug":"honey","id":"SB-0059","name":"Honey","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Natural Product","descriptors":["sweet","floral","warm","waxy"],"contexts":["breakfast","tea","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"brown-sugar","id":"SB-0181","name":"Brown Sugar","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","molasses"],"contexts":["baking cupboard","breakfast","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-brown-sugar--honey","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-brown-sugar--honey","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/brown-sugar--honey","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-butter--cooked-rice","slug":"butter--cooked-rice","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-butter--cooked-rice","candidateId":"PRED-butter--cooked-rice","pair":{"a":{"slug":"butter","id":"SB-0054","name":"Butter","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["creamy","rich","soft","warm"],"contexts":["baking","toast","kitchen"]},"b":{"slug":"cooked-rice","id":"SB-0159","name":"Cooked Rice","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["grain","warm","soft","starchy"],"contexts":["kitchen","rice cooker","family meal"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-RICE-001","slug":"cooked-rice-aroma-and-2ap","title":"Cooked rice aroma and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline","smellSlugs":["cooked-rice"],"sourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"text":"Cooked rice contains many volatile compounds, while 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline is a well-established contributor to the characteristic aroma of aromatic rice.","scope":"Supports aroma complexity and the role of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in aromatic rice; not every rice variety has the same sensory profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-RICE-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-RICE-2008","slug":"rice-aroma-2008","title":"Rice Aroma and Flavor: A Literature Review","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Cereal Chemistry","date":"2008-07-10","doi":"10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445","url":"https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-butter--cooked-rice","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-butter--cooked-rice","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-RICE-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-RICE-2008"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/butter--cooked-rice","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-butter--peanut-butter","slug":"butter--peanut-butter","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-butter--peanut-butter","candidateId":"PRED-butter--peanut-butter","pair":{"a":{"slug":"butter","id":"SB-0054","name":"Butter","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["creamy","rich","soft","warm"],"contexts":["baking","toast","kitchen"]},"b":{"slug":"peanut-butter","id":"SB-0123","name":"Peanut Butter","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["nutty","roasted","warm","rich"],"contexts":["toast","sandwich","breakfast"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-butter--peanut-butter","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-butter--peanut-butter","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/butter--peanut-butter","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-butter--vanilla-bean","slug":"butter--vanilla-bean","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-butter--vanilla-bean","candidateId":"PRED-butter--vanilla-bean","pair":{"a":{"slug":"vanilla-bean","id":"SB-0020","name":"Vanilla Bean","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["vanilla pod","baking","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"butter","id":"SB-0054","name":"Butter","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Material","descriptors":["creamy","rich","soft","warm"],"contexts":["baking","toast","kitchen"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-butter--vanilla-bean","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-butter--vanilla-bean","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/butter--vanilla-bean","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--fresh-bread","slug":"caramel--fresh-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--fresh-bread","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--fresh-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fresh-bread","id":"SB-0009","name":"Fresh Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Experience","descriptors":["baked","warm","toasted","soft"],"contexts":["bakery","kitchen","morning street"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--fresh-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--fresh-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--fresh-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--fried-onions","slug":"caramel--fried-onions","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--fried-onions","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--fried-onions","pair":{"a":{"slug":"fried-onions","id":"SB-0134","name":"Fried Onions","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["savory","warm","sweet","fried"],"contexts":["frying pan","restaurant kitchen","home cooking"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--fried-onions","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--fried-onions","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--fried-onions","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--grilled-bread","slug":"caramel--grilled-bread","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--grilled-bread","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--grilled-bread","pair":{"a":{"slug":"grilled-bread","id":"SB-0135","name":"Grilled Bread","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","browned"],"contexts":["grill","breakfast","restaurant"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--grilled-bread","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--grilled-bread","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--grilled-bread","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--popcorn","slug":"caramel--popcorn","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--popcorn","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--popcorn","pair":{"a":{"slug":"popcorn","id":"SB-0160","name":"Popcorn","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","grain","buttery"],"contexts":["kitchen","movie night","snack bowl"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--popcorn","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--popcorn","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--popcorn","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-caramel--toast","slug":"caramel--toast","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-caramel--toast","candidateId":"PRED-caramel--toast","pair":{"a":{"slug":"toast","id":"SB-0037","name":"Toast","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / State","descriptors":["toasted","warm","dry","roasted"],"contexts":["breakfast","kitchen","toast rack"]},"b":{"slug":"caramel","id":"SB-0161","name":"Caramel","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["sweet","caramelized","warm","toasted"],"contexts":["dessert","baking","candy"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[{"id":"CLM-CARAMEL-001","slug":"caramelisation-forms-aroma-volatiles","title":"Caramelisation forms aroma-active volatile compounds","smellSlugs":["caramel"],"sourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"text":"Heating sugars during caramelisation forms both brown-colored products and volatile compounds responsible for characteristic caramel aroma.","scope":"Supports aroma formation during sugar caramelisation; exact products depend on sugar type and reaction conditions.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]}],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-CARAMEL-1994","slug":"caramelisation-1994","title":"Caramelisation in food and beverages","tier":"REVIEW","kind":"REVIEW","publisher":"Food Chemistry","date":"1994-01-01","doi":"10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-caramel--toast","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-caramel--toast","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-CARAMEL-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-CARAMEL-1994"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/caramel--toast","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-chamomile--lilac","slug":"chamomile--lilac","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-chamomile--lilac","candidateId":"PRED-chamomile--lilac","pair":{"a":{"slug":"lilac","id":"SB-0064","name":"Lilac","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Floral Reference","descriptors":["floral","soft","sweet","green"],"contexts":["flowering shrub","garden","cut flowers"]},"b":{"slug":"chamomile","id":"SB-0066","name":"Chamomile","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Herbal Reference","descriptors":["herbal","soft","floral","dry"],"contexts":["herbal tea","dried flower","garden"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-chamomile--lilac","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-chamomile--lilac","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/chamomile--lilac","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-chamomile--rose","slug":"chamomile--rose","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-chamomile--rose","candidateId":"PRED-chamomile--rose","pair":{"a":{"slug":"rose","id":"SB-0006","name":"Rose","category":"Nature","type":"Source","descriptors":["floral","petal","green","soft"],"contexts":["garden","cut flowers","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"chamomile","id":"SB-0066","name":"Chamomile","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Herbal Reference","descriptors":["herbal","soft","floral","dry"],"contexts":["herbal tea","dried flower","garden"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-chamomile--rose","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-chamomile--rose","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/chamomile--rose","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon--fried-onions","slug":"cinnamon--fried-onions","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon--fried-onions","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon--fried-onions","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon","id":"SB-0035","name":"Cinnamon","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"fried-onions","id":"SB-0134","name":"Fried Onions","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["savory","warm","sweet","fried"],"contexts":["frying pan","restaurant kitchen","home cooking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon--fried-onions","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon--fried-onions","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon--fried-onions","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","slug":"cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]},"b":{"slug":"fried-onions","id":"SB-0134","name":"Fried Onions","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Prepared State","descriptors":["savory","warm","sweet","fried"],"contexts":["frying pan","restaurant kitchen","home cooking"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon-roll--fried-onions","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","slug":"cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","candidateId":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","pair":{"a":{"slug":"cinnamon-roll","id":"SB-0049","name":"Cinnamon Roll","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Experience","descriptors":["baked","sweet","spicy","warm"],"contexts":["bakery","breakfast","fresh pastry"]},"b":{"slug":"nutmeg","id":"SB-0157","name":"Nutmeg","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","dry","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","dessert"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/cinnamon-roll--nutmeg","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-classroom--library","slug":"classroom--library","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-classroom--library","candidateId":"PRED-classroom--library","pair":{"a":{"slug":"library","id":"SB-0028","name":"Library","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","dry","quiet","woody"],"contexts":["public library","archive room","reading room"]},"b":{"slug":"classroom","id":"SB-0094","name":"Classroom","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","woody","dry","familiar"],"contexts":["school room","desk","lesson"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-OLDBOOK-001","slug":"old-book-paper-degradation-volatiles","title":"Old-book aroma and paper degradation volatiles","smellSlugs":["old-book","library"],"sourceIds":["SRC-OLDBOOK-2009"],"text":"Research on historic paper has measured volatile organic compounds released during material degradation and linked those emissions to the characteristic smell of old books.","scope":"Supports the role of paper degradation volatiles; individual books and libraries can differ by materials, storage and environment.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-OLDBOOK-2009","slug":"old-book-2009","title":"Material Degradomics: On the Smell of Old Books","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Analytical Chemistry","date":"2009-09-17","doi":"10.1021/ac9016049","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9016049"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-OLDBOOK-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-OLDBOOK-2009"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-OLDBOOK-2009","slug":"old-book-2009","title":"Material Degradomics: On the Smell of Old Books","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Analytical Chemistry","date":"2009-09-17","doi":"10.1021/ac9016049","url":"https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9016049"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-classroom--library","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-classroom--library","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-OLDBOOK-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-OLDBOOK-2009"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/classroom--library","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-classroom--office","slug":"classroom--office","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-classroom--office","candidateId":"PRED-classroom--office","pair":{"a":{"slug":"classroom","id":"SB-0094","name":"Classroom","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","woody","dry","familiar"],"contexts":["school room","desk","lesson"]},"b":{"slug":"office","id":"SB-0143","name":"Office","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","dry","ambient","work"],"contexts":["desk area","meeting room","shared office"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-classroom--office","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-classroom--office","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/classroom--office","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-classroom--woodshop","slug":"classroom--woodshop","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-classroom--woodshop","candidateId":"PRED-classroom--woodshop","pair":{"a":{"slug":"classroom","id":"SB-0094","name":"Classroom","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["paper","woody","dry","familiar"],"contexts":["school room","desk","lesson"]},"b":{"slug":"woodshop","id":"SB-0163","name":"Woodshop","category":"Places","type":"Place / Environment","descriptors":["woody","dry","fresh","workshop"],"contexts":["carpentry shop","woodworking bench","sawdust floor"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-classroom--woodshop","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-classroom--woodshop","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/classroom--woodshop","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clay--moss","slug":"clay--moss","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clay--moss","candidateId":"PRED-clay--moss","pair":{"a":{"slug":"moss","id":"SB-0061","name":"Moss","category":"Nature","type":"Source / Environment","descriptors":["green","damp","earthy","cool"],"contexts":["shaded forest","wet stone","tree bark"]},"b":{"slug":"clay","id":"SB-0104","name":"Clay","category":"Nature","type":"Material / Earth","descriptors":["earthy","mineral","damp","cool"],"contexts":["pottery studio","wet clay","earth"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clay--moss","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clay--moss","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clay--moss","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clay--rain","slug":"clay--rain","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clay--rain","candidateId":"PRED-clay--rain","pair":{"a":{"slug":"rain","id":"SB-0001","name":"Rain","category":"Nature","type":"Phenomenon","descriptors":["wet","mineral","cool","earthy"],"contexts":["after summer heat","city pavement","forest soil"]},"b":{"slug":"clay","id":"SB-0104","name":"Clay","category":"Nature","type":"Material / Earth","descriptors":["earthy","mineral","damp","cool"],"contexts":["pottery studio","wet clay","earth"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[{"id":"CLM-PETRICHOR-001","slug":"petrichor-rain-on-dry-ground","title":"Petrichor and rain on dry ground","smellSlugs":["rain","petrichor","soil","garden-after-rain"],"sourceIds":["SRC-PETRICHOR-1964"],"text":"The scientific literature has used the term petrichor for the characteristic earthy odour associated with rain acting on dry mineral and soil environments.","scope":"Historical scientific framing of petrichor; this does not mean every rainy environment has one identical chemical profile.","sources":[{"id":"SRC-PETRICHOR-1964","slug":"petrichor-1964","title":"Nature of Argillaceous Odour","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Nature","date":"1964-03-07","doi":"10.1038/201993a0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1038/201993a0"}]}],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":["CLM-PETRICHOR-001"]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":["SRC-PETRICHOR-1964"],"sources":[{"id":"SRC-PETRICHOR-1964","slug":"petrichor-1964","title":"Nature of Argillaceous Odour","tier":"PRIMARY","kind":"PRIMARY RESEARCH","publisher":"Nature","date":"1964-03-07","doi":"10.1038/201993a0","url":"https://doi.org/10.1038/201993a0"}]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":false,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clay--rain","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clay--rain","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":["CLM-PETRICHOR-001"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":["SRC-PETRICHOR-1964"],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clay--rain","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clean-linen--fresh-towels","slug":"clean-linen--fresh-towels","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clean-linen--fresh-towels","candidateId":"PRED-clean-linen--fresh-towels","pair":{"a":{"slug":"clean-linen","id":"SB-0010","name":"Clean Linen","category":"Objects","type":"Cultural / Product","descriptors":["clean","airy","soft","fresh"],"contexts":["fresh sheets","laundry","hotel room"]},"b":{"slug":"fresh-towels","id":"SB-0083","name":"Fresh Towels","category":"Objects","type":"Product / Experience","descriptors":["clean","soft","warm","fresh"],"contexts":["bathroom","laundry","hotel room"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clean-linen--fresh-towels","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clean-linen--fresh-towels","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clean-linen--fresh-towels","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clove--curry-spice-blend","slug":"clove--curry-spice-blend","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clove--curry-spice-blend","candidateId":"PRED-clove--curry-spice-blend","pair":{"a":{"slug":"clove","id":"SB-0156","name":"Clove","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]},"b":{"slug":"curry-spice-blend","id":"SB-0183","name":"Curry Spice Blend","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Composition","descriptors":["spicy","warm","aromatic","mixed"],"contexts":["kitchen","spice blend","cooking preparation"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clove--curry-spice-blend","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clove--curry-spice-blend","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clove--curry-spice-blend","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clove--maple-syrup","slug":"clove--maple-syrup","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clove--maple-syrup","candidateId":"PRED-clove--maple-syrup","pair":{"a":{"slug":"maple-syrup","id":"SB-0136","name":"Maple Syrup","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Food / Product","descriptors":["sweet","warm","caramelized","woody"],"contexts":["breakfast","pancakes","baking"]},"b":{"slug":"clove","id":"SB-0156","name":"Clove","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clove--maple-syrup","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clove--maple-syrup","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clove--maple-syrup","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."},{"id":"CONTEXT-clove--vanilla-bean","slug":"clove--vanilla-bean","status":"EXPERIMENTAL_CONTEXT","reviewPacketId":"REVIEW-clove--vanilla-bean","candidateId":"PRED-clove--vanilla-bean","pair":{"a":{"slug":"vanilla-bean","id":"SB-0020","name":"Vanilla Bean","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source","descriptors":["sweet","warm","soft","creamy"],"contexts":["vanilla pod","baking","fragrance composition"]},"b":{"slug":"clove","id":"SB-0156","name":"Clove","category":"Food & Drink","type":"Source / Spice","descriptors":["spicy","warm","sweet","woody"],"contexts":["baking","spice cupboard","hot drink"]}},"claimContext":{"a":[],"b":[],"pairMentioningClaims":[],"uniqueClaimIds":[]},"sourceContext":{"uniqueSourceIds":[],"sources":[]},"gaps":{"aHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"bHasNoVerifiedClaim":true,"noPairMentioningVerifiedClaim":true,"meaning":"A gap means only that no matching VERIFIED claim is present in the current public source registry for this context. It is not negative evidence and does not mean the candidate is false."},"provenanceTrail":[{"step":1,"kind":"candidate","ref":"PRED-clove--vanilla-bean","status":"PREDICTED"},{"step":2,"kind":"review-packet","ref":"REVIEW-clove--vanilla-bean","status":"REVIEW_PENDING"},{"step":3,"kind":"verified-claim-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"},{"step":4,"kind":"registered-source-context","refs":[],"status":"CONTEXT_ONLY"}],"explicitPublicRelationAtContextBuild":false,"prompts":[{"key":"claim-scope","question":"What does each VERIFIED claim actually support, and what does its scope explicitly not establish?"},{"key":"source-origin","question":"Which registered source supports the claim, and what source tier, publisher and date are public?"},{"key":"pair-relevance","question":"Does the evidence concern one smell, both smells, or neither candidate relation itself?"},{"key":"absence-meaning","question":"Is a missing claim being treated only as missing public evidence context rather than evidence that a relation is false?"},{"key":"verification-separation","question":"Would any relation judgment remain separate from the claim-specific VERIFIED evidence process?"}],"recordedDecision":null,"promotionEffect":"none","canonicalMutation":false,"verifiedMutation":false,"route":"/labs/context/clove--vanilla-bean","boundary":"VERIFIED claims and registered sources shown here are context for human inspection. Their presence does not verify the candidate pair, and their absence does not disprove it."}]}